This issue of Israel violence with Palestine
is of many angles from the last many years where many innocent lives have been
killed. In an appearance at Harvard University, Secretary of State John Kerry
appeared to draw a link between the wave of violence and increased Israeli
settlements in the occupied West Bank. "There’s been a massive increase in
settlements over the course of the last years," Kerry said. "Now you
have this violence because there’s a frustration that’s growing." We get
reaction to Kerry’s comments from Gideon Levy, a journalist with the Israeli
newspaper Haaretz. "John Kerry’s declaration is rather hypocritical,"
Levy says. "If they really wanted to put an end to the occupation, the
occupation would have ended a long time ago."
Our guests are Diana Buttu—she’s in the
studio in Haifa, a Palestinian attorney. Budour Hassan is joining us by Democracy
Now! video stream
from Jerusalem, a Palestinian student and writer. And Gideon Levy is also with us,Haaretz columnist, in Tel Aviv.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: In
an appearance at Harvard University, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared to
draw a link between the wave of violence and increased Israeli settlements in
the occupied West Bank thus creating unrest in whole the region..
SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY: Unless
we get going, a two-state solution could conceivably be stolen from everybody.
And there’s been a massive increase in settlements over the course of the last
years. Now you have this violence because there’s a frustration that is
growing—and a frustration among Israelis, who don’t see any movement. So, I
look at that, and I say, you know, if that did explode—and I pray and hope it
won’t, and I think there are options to prevent that—but we would inevitably
be—you know, at some point, we’re going to have to be engaged in working
through those kinds of difficulties. So, better to try to find the ways to deal
with it before that happens than later.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: That was Secretary of State John Kerry speaking Tuesday. Gideon Levy, could you respond to what he said and give us a sense of what the mood there is?
NERMEEN SHAIKH: That was Secretary of State John Kerry speaking Tuesday. Gideon Levy, could you respond to what he said and give us a sense of what the mood there is?
GIDEON LEVY: Unfortunately, I must say that John Kerry’s declaration is rather hypocritic. The Americans could have prevented long time ago; the Americans know exactly how to prevent it. If they really wanted to put an end to the occupation, the Israeli occupation would have come to its end long time ago. This policy of only serving carrots to Israel, of flattering to Israel again and again, is now decades long and never worked, never, ever worked. And the Americans never really tried the alternative path of putting pressure on Israel in order to bring Israel back to the international law, back to legal and order, back to morality.
And now John Kerry is saying that this can be
prevented and should be prevented? Where were you in the last 67 years, in the
last 48 years, when Israel is so much depending on the United States like never
before, and you just gave Israel a carte blanche to go wild in Gaza, in the West Bank,
again and again, build settlements, go for wars, and never tried to push Israel
and to put an end to all this? So, really, with all the respect to John Kerry’s
good intentions, this is not the way to deal with Israel after all those years.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: But
Israeli government officials, Gideon Levy, if you could give us a sense of how
they’ve responded to remarks made by U.S. officials? The defense minister,
Moshe Ya’alon, for example, accused Washington of completely misreading the
situation on the ground in Israel-Palestine. The public security minister
called the U.S. remarks "foolish."
GIDEON LEVY: Yeah,
they got all the same message from the prime minister’s office: now to condemn
the United States. In the last years, they found out that condemning the United
States doesn’t take any price. Israel can talk to and about the American
administration as if Israel is the superpower and the United States is just
like one of those small countries which depend on Israel. They allow themselves
what no country in the world allows themselves vis-à-vis the United States,
going and trying to sabotage an international agreement with Iran in the
American Congress against the American administration. Things which are unheard
of by any other country, Israel learned in the recent years that they are
possible—and not only possible, they are productive, and they are working. So,
sure, Israel will attack now the Americans for any kind of criticism—
AMY GOODMAN: I
want to bring Diana—
GIDEON LEVY: —because,
you know, the Americans will not punish Israel for this.
AMY GOODMAN: I
want to bring Diana Buttu into—back into the conversation. Also, Netanyahu was
speaking at the U.N. General Assembly saying that Israel will now negotiate
with the Palestinians without any preconditions.
DIANA BUTTU: But
that is a farce. I mean, one of the things that Netanyahu has said over and
over again is that he’s not going to stop any settlement construction, in fact
that he’s going to continue it. And, in fact, this is what has actually
happened. In addition, what he’s also said is that they reserve the right to
continue to kill Palestinians. And so, while he indicates that he has no
preconditions, in fact, it’s quite the opposite.
But the issue is not whether there are
preconditions, it’s whether the negotiations process actually works. And it
doesn’t. I was part of the negotiations process. You cannot negotiate with one
very powerful party, backed by a superpower—the United States—and a very weak
party. We call that dictation. The negotiations have failed over the course of
the past 22 years.
And so, now is the time, rather than heading
back to negotiations, which only serve to give Israel more legitimacy, only
serve to give Israel more international recognition—in fact, more countries
started recognizing Israel after the negotiations process began than before
it—rather than going back to that process, which was failed and futile for
Palestinians, there needs to be a different way. And this different way is to
be pushing for boycotts against Israel, to be pushing for divestment, and to be
pushing for sanctions, to be pushing for Israel to be held accountable under
international law, and to be pushing for Israel’s isolation. All of those
measures will work. But going back to a failed negotiations process will not.
AMY GOODMAN: How
does the Al-Aqsa Mosque fit into this, the current unrest?
DIANA BUTTU: Amy, this is one of the reasons that we are seeing these latest round and latest wave of protests. If you just look back about a year ago, a year ago there was a very brutal Israeli attack on Gaza in which Israelis—in which the Israeli army killed more than 2,000 Palestinians, including more than 500 children. A hundred thousand Palestinian homes and businesses were demolished or destroyed, and still to this day remain unbuilt.
DIANA BUTTU: Amy, this is one of the reasons that we are seeing these latest round and latest wave of protests. If you just look back about a year ago, a year ago there was a very brutal Israeli attack on Gaza in which Israelis—in which the Israeli army killed more than 2,000 Palestinians, including more than 500 children. A hundred thousand Palestinian homes and businesses were demolished or destroyed, and still to this day remain unbuilt.
AMY GOODMAN: Diana
Buttu, we want to thank you for being with us, joining us from Haifa, a
Palestine-based attorney. Budour Hassan, who was joining by video stream from
Jerusalem and a Palestinian writer, writes for The
Electronic Intifada. And the Israeli writer Gideon Levy, a Haaretz columnist, joining us from Tel Aviv.
No comments:
Post a Comment